Search for: "Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherungs AG"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2008, 11:11 am
In Markel Capital Limited v (1) Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG (2) Continentale Sachversicherung AG and Bloemers & Partners Limited [2008] EWHC 2517 (Comm), the Court was asked to consider a summary judgment application by Markel in respect of its claim for a declaration of non-liability on the ground that a condition precedent to its liability had not been satisfied. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:47 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Urushadze, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 2498 (08 October 2008) Lavery, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 2499 (09 October 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) O’Brien & Ors v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1159 (24 October 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Club La Costa (UK) Plc v Gebhard & Ors [2008] EWHC 2552 (QB) (24 October 2008) High Court (Commercial Court) Markel Capital Ltd v Gothaer… [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:22 am
Opinion: Case C-456/11, Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG v Samskip GmbH – a preliminary judgment on a question of jurisdiction (as to the validity and effectiveness of a choice of court agreement in favour of the courts of Iceland) is a “judgment” which must be recognised under the Regulation, and findings as to the validity and scope of the agreement are binding on the court addressed regardless of… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:40 am
In Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung ./. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
(See C-456/11 Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG v Samskip GmbH EU:C:2012:719, [2013] QB 548) The Hague Convention does not similarly protect the ruling of a non-chosen court. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
However, the European Court of Justice extends the effects of res judicata to prejudicial questions of the validity of a choice-of-forum clause, in this respect it approves a European conception of substantive res judicata (ECJ, 15.11.2012 – Case C 456/11 – Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG ./. [read post]
